Posted on August 25, 2008 - by Venik
Saakashvili Finally Loses It
Ever since Georgia launched its military operation against South Ossetia, killing Russian peacekeepers and hundreds of its own civilians, many have been asking the same question: has Saakashvili gone stark raving mad? It’s now official: yes. In his latest interview to Financial Times, Saakashvili revealed dark depths of madness that made even Putin shudder:
“The first thing that happened was that the Russian tanks came in,” Mr Saakashvili told the Financial Times during a late night interview in his office. He added: “From our point of view [the Georgian military] was responding to a Russian invasion.”
Mr Saakashvili’s claims could not be independently verified.
However, on the night of August 7, when Georgian forces began their rocket and artillery barrage of Tskhinvali, the South Ossetian capital, Brigadier General Mamuka Kurashvili, the chief of Georgian peacekeepers in South Ossetia, went on Georgian television to say Georgia’s “power-wielding bodies” had “decided to restore constitutional order” in the breakaway region.
Mr Saakashvili denies ever using those words. He said his forces moved to slow a Russian advance into Georgia in order to “confront them for three days and to wake up the world”.
General Kurashvili also did not mention Russian armour…
In Mr Saakashvili’s version, he is blameless for the resulting crisis that has destroyed much of the Georgian military…
…”In terms of trying to remove me, the Russians have grossly miscalculated. If you attack a democratic country and say that your main target is the president, it doesn’t make the president weaker,” said Mr Saakashvili.
(Source: Saakashvili lays blame for crisis firmly on Russia, by Jan Cienski, Financial Times, August 25, 2008)
Needless to say, by denying the history of what happened in South Ossetia on August 7-8, Saakashvili compromises the ceasefire agreement and everyone who stood behind it, including Sarkozy and Rice. If the Kremlin wishes so, it can easily portray Saakashvili’s latest statements as yet another reason why Russian peacekeepers need protection from the Tbilisi madman.
I am afraid I wasted a whole lot of time trying to analyze Georgia’s tactics and strategy in this war. It would seem that the war in Georgia will be best explained not by military analysts but by psychiatrists. As if Saakashvili’s brutal aggression and humiliating defeat were not enough embarrassment for the US and the EU, it now appears that for the past four years NATO has been arming and training an army led by a certifiable nutcase. I just can’t wait to see Dr. Rice and Sarkozy spin that one.
Popularity: 2% [?]
Join the forum discussion on this post - (1) Posts
Related posts:
- Saakashvili’s Army on the Run
- Georgia’s Attack on South Ossetia: Washington’s Role
- Saakashvili’s Endgame
- Holbrooke Paid by Saakashvili?
- Georgia’s Blunder
Visit My Website
August 25, 2008
Permalink
Saakashvili seems to be copying Bush/Cheney by offering up the Big Lie, even in the face of incontrovertible evidence, because he has the West’s Propaganda System on his side, a System well known for never examining the facts when they disprove the Big Lie. It will be interesting to see if this gains traction. I wonder what clear-thinking Georgians are thinking?
Reply
Visit My Website
August 25, 2008
Permalink
Fortunately, Saakashvili’s Big Lie will not hold up. His propaganda machine is styled in the best traditions of Fox, but its resources are rather limited. The only reason for its initial success was Russia’s characteristic laziness in PR matters. They are catching up, though.
Reply
Visit My Website
August 25, 2008
Permalink
You mentioned that Russia captured maps detailing Georgia’s invasion plans; have any of them been published? The invasion details combined with video of Saakashvili’s invasion eve broadcast where he said he was going to resume negotiations would seem to derail his Big Lie quite well.
karlof1
Reply